↓ Skip to main content

Could resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta improve survival among severely injured patients with post-intubation hypotension?

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Could resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta improve survival among severely injured patients with post-intubation hypotension?
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00068-018-0947-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramiro Manzano-Nunez, Juan Pablo Herrera-Escobar, Joseph DuBose, Tal Hörer, Samuel Galvagno, Claudia Patricia Orlas, Michael W. Parra, Federico Coccolini, Massimo Sartelli, Juan Camilo Falla-Martinez, Alberto Federico García, Julian Chica, Maria Paula Naranjo, Alvaro Ignacio Sanchez, Camilo Jose Salazar, Luis Eduardo Calderón-Tapia, Valeria Lopez-Castilla, Paula Ferrada, Ernest E. Moore, Carlos A. Ordonez

Abstract

Current literature shows the association of post-intubation hypotension and increased odds of mortality in critically ill non-trauma and trauma populations. However, there is a lack of research on potential interventions that can prevent or ameliorate the consequences of endotracheal intubation and thus improve the prognosis of trauma patients with post-intubation hypotension. This review paper hypothesizes that the deployment of REBOA among trauma patients with PIH, by its physiologic effects, will reduce the odds of mortality in this population. The objective of this paper is to review the current literature on REBOA and post-intubation hypotension, and, furthermore, to provide a rational hypothesis on the potential role of REBOA in severely injured patients with post-intubation hypotension.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 19%
Other 5 16%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 50%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 31%