↓ Skip to main content

Over-expression of CNTF in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells protects RPE cells from short-wavelength, blue-light injury

Overview of attention for article published in In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Over-expression of CNTF in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells protects RPE cells from short-wavelength, blue-light injury
Published in
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11626-018-0243-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wen Lin, Guoxing Xu

Abstract

Increasing evidence has demonstrated that excessive blue-light (BL) with high photochemical energy and phototoxicity could induce apoptosis in retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells. RPE apoptosis leads to retina damage and further aggravate age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). Because of their neuroprotective, plasticity, and immunomodulatory ability, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) are recognized for retinal neuroprotection. RPE cells possess ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) receptor complexes and can respond to CNTF; hence, we investigated the effects of BMSCs over-expressing CNTF on BL-injured RPE cells. BL-injured RPE cells were co-cultured with CNTF-BMSCs and GFP-BMSCs for 24 and 48 h. Superoxide dismutase and malondialdehyde assays were conducted to examine the effects of CNTF-BMSCs on the oxidative stress of RPE cells. VEGF protein secretion by RPE was determined by ELISA, and western blotting analysis was used to determine apoptotic protein expression and autophagic flux. Immunofluorescence was used to demonstrate the relationship between autophagy and apoptosis. We found that CNTF-BMSCs enhanced antioxidant capacity, decreased VEGF secretion, promoted autophagic flux, and inhibited apoptosis in BL-injured RPE cells, compared to GFP-BMSCs. Our findings suggest that CNTF over-expression enhances the protective effects of BMSCs on RPE cells, thus indicating subretinal-transplantation of CNTF-BMSCs may be a promising therapy for BL-injured retina.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2018.
All research outputs
#20,469,520
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal
#670
of 797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,521
of 332,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 797 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.