↓ Skip to main content

ATM inhibition prevents interleukin-6 from contributing to the proliferation of glioblastoma cells after ionizing radiation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
ATM inhibition prevents interleukin-6 from contributing to the proliferation of glioblastoma cells after ionizing radiation
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11060-018-2838-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Chieh Lim, Hazel Quek, Carolin Offenhäuser, Shazrul Fazry, Andrew Boyd, Martin Lavin, Tara Roberts, Bryan Day

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly fatal disease with a 5 year survival rate of less than 22%. One of the most effective treatment regimens to date is the use of radiotherapy which induces lethal DNA double-strand breaks to prevent tumour growth. However, recurrence occurs in the majority of patients and is in-part a result of robust radioresistance mechanisms. In this study, we demonstrate that the multifunctional cytokine, interleukin-6 (IL-6), confers a growth advantage in GBM cells but does not have the same effect on normal neural progenitor cells. Further analysis showed IL-6 can promote radioresistance in GBM cells when exposed to ionising radiation. Ablation of the Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated serine/threonine kinase that is recruited and activated by DNA double-strand breaks reverses the effect of radioresistance and re-sensitised GBM to DNA damage thus leading to increase cell death. Our finding suggests targeting the signaling cascade of DNA damage response is a potential therapeutic approach to circumvent IL-6 from promoting radioresistance in GBM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Other 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,158,693
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,927
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,079
of 333,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#44
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.