↓ Skip to main content

o-Phthalyl amidase in the synthesis of loracarbef: Process development using this novel biocatalyst

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology Techniques, August 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
o-Phthalyl amidase in the synthesis of loracarbef: Process development using this novel biocatalyst
Published in
Biotechnology Techniques, August 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00154613
Authors

Thomas D. Black, Barbara S. Briggs, Robert Evans, William L. Muth, Surya Vangala, Milton J. Zmijewski

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2008.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology Techniques
#827
of 2,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,376
of 28,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology Techniques
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.