| Title |
Ceramic Technology and Social Boundaries: Cultural Practices in Kalinga Clay Selection and Use
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, December 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1026518922642 |
| Authors |
Miriam T. Stark, Ronald L. Bishop, Elizabeth Miksa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| Argentina | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Philippines | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 186 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 28% |
| Researcher | 34 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 85 | 40% |
| Arts and Humanities | 78 | 37% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#188
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,158
of 114,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them