| Title |
Extensive gene duplications and a large inversion characterize the human leukocyte receptor cluster
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Immunogenetics, July 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s002510000187 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hagen Wende, Armin Volz, Andreas Ziegler |
| Abstract |
The chromosomal region 19q13.4 harbors the human leukocyte receptor cluster (LRC) which has been demonstrated to contain 19 genes encoding leukocyte-expressed receptors of the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily. A spotted PAC library was used to construct a contig of 65 overlapping clones spanning the complete LRC. Within the 900 kb covered by the contig, we identified one cluster containing killer cell inhibitory receptor genes and two clusters containing Ig-like transcript (ILT) genes. Of these, the second ILT cluster, located at the centromeric end of the LRC, was previously unknown. Detailed analysis of the ILT receptor genes in this cluster revealed one novel (ILT11) and six already known ILT genes. The two ILT clusters are transcribed in opposite directions and are separated by about 200 kb, which contains two leukocyte-associated inhibitory receptor (LAIR) genes. The data suggest that the two ILT clusters, each including one LAIR locus, arose from a single ancestral ILT/LAIR cluster by inverse duplication of a c large genomic fragment. Furthermore, the NK cell-expressed NKp46 gene was localized 20 kb telomeric of FCAR; and 14 novel genes mapping within the LRC were identified by cDNA selection. Together with the gene for the ribosomal protein S9 (RPS9), which had previously been assigned to 19q13.4, the total number of LRC genes is now 44. Of these, 29 belong to the Ig superfamily. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Montenegro | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 24% |
| Researcher | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 24% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Immunogenetics
#350
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,226
of 39,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunogenetics
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.