| Title |
Fine structure of swarmers of Cladophora and Chaetomorpha
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Planta, June 1972
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00387719 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David G. Robinson, R. K. White, R. D. Preston |
| Abstract |
Naked swarmers of Cladophora have been collected and wall synthesis and development have been followed using the techniques of freeze-etching and sectioning. Swarmers frozen after 9 hours liberation have lost their flagella, developed the characteristic fibrous layer and show the initial stages of wall production. Both the first formed (randomly oriented) and the later (more ordered) microfibrils appear to have a distinct granular texture. Occasionally linear arrays of granules up to 4 μm long may be seen. After 5 days settling a thick wall composed of almost transversely oriented microfibrils is present and a rhizoid is pushed out. Also characteristic of this stage is the central localisation of cell components and peripheral vacuolar distribution. Longitudinally oriented microtubules also reappear at this stage having been absent during carlier wall formation.A possible relationship between the cortical microtubules of the motile swarmer and the development of the fibrous layer is suggested. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#674
of 2,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#737
of 3,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,980 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.