↓ Skip to main content

Infection of Drosophila suzukii with the obligate insect-pathogenic fungus Entomophthora muscae

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pest Science, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Infection of Drosophila suzukii with the obligate insect-pathogenic fungus Entomophthora muscae
Published in
Journal of Pest Science, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10340-017-0915-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul G. Becher, Rasmus E. Jensen, Myrsini E. Natsopoulou, Vasiliki Verschut, Henrik H. De Fine Licht

Abstract

Physiological constraints restrict specialist pathogens from infecting new hosts. From an applied perspective, a narrow host range makes specialist pathogens interesting for targeting specific pest insects since they have minimal direct effects on non-target species. Entomopathogenic fungi of the genusEntomophthoraare dipteran-specific but have not been investigated for their ability to infect the spotted wing drosophila (SWD;Drosophila suzukii) a fruit-damaging pest invasive to Europe and America. Our main goal was to study whether SWD is in the physiological host range of the entomophthoralean speciesE. muscae. We investigated pathogenicity and virulence ofE. muscaetowards its main natural host, the houseflyMusca domestica, and towards SWD. We found thatE. muscaereadily infected and significantly reduced survival of SWD by 27.3% with the majority of flies dying 4-8 days post-exposure. In comparison with SWD, infection of the natural hostM. domesticaresulted in an even higher mortality of 62.9% and larger conidial spores ofE. muscae, reflecting the physiological constraints of the pathogen in the atypical host. We demonstrated that pathogens of theE. muscaespecies complex that typically have a narrow natural host range of one or few dipteran species are able to infect SWD, and we described a new method for in vivo transmission and infection of an entomophthoralean fungus to SWD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 21 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 22 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2018.
All research outputs
#6,872,724
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pest Science
#172
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,971
of 316,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pest Science
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them