Title |
Petrographic and XRF analyses of andesitic cut stone blocks at Teotihuacan, Mexico: implications for the organization of urban construction
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, March 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12520-018-0619-5 |
Authors |
Tatsuya Murakami, Matthew T. Boulanger, Michael D. Glascock |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 22% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 6 | 33% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 17% |
Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2018.
All research outputs
#20,469,520
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#699
of 798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,860
of 333,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#25
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.