↓ Skip to main content

The decade of exosomal long RNA species: an emerging cancer antagonist

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cancer, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
The decade of exosomal long RNA species: an emerging cancer antagonist
Published in
Molecular Cancer, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12943-018-0823-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruihao Zhou, Kaddie Kwok Chen, Jingtao Zhang, Bufan Xiao, Zhaohao Huang, Cheng Ju, Jun Sun, Feifei Zhang, Xiao-Bin Lv, Guofu Huang

Abstract

Exosomes have emerged as a novel approach for the treatment and diagnosis of cancer after RNA content was discovered in exosomes in 2007. As important meditators of intercellular communication, exosomes have become a strong focus of investigation for researchers in the past decade, as witnessed through the exponential increase of research on exosomes. The capability of exosomes to transfer functionally active cargo highlights their importance as promising biomarkers and diagnostic molecules, as well as prospective drug delivery systems. The accessibility of exosomes in nearly all biofluids additionally alludes to its unprecedented ability in various types of cancers due to its extensive impact on tumor formation and progression. This review analyzes the role of exosomal long RNA species, which is comprised of mRNA, lncRNA, and circRNA, in tumor formation and progression, with an emphasis on their potential as future diagnostic biomarkers and treatment vectors in cancer biology. Their alignment with the development of exosomal databases is further examined in this review, in view of the accumulation of studies published on exosomes in the past decade.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 38 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 48 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,865,498
of 23,549,388 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cancer
#86
of 1,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,539
of 333,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cancer
#6
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,549,388 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.