Title |
Diversification of feeding structures in three adult Antarctic nototheniid fish
|
---|---|
Published in |
Polar Biology, March 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00300-018-2310-9 |
Authors |
Erica Carlig, Davide Di Blasi, Laura Ghigliotti, Eva Pisano, Marco Faimali, Richard O’Driscoll, Steve Parker, Marino Vacchi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
Researcher | 2 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 30% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,157,817
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#241
of 1,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,445
of 331,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#10
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.