↓ Skip to main content

Role of snare proteins in CFTR and ENaC trafficking

Overview of attention for article published in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, July 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Role of snare proteins in CFTR and ENaC trafficking
Published in
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, July 2001
DOI 10.1007/s004240100647
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn W. Peters, Juanjuan Qi, John P. Johnson, Simon C. Watkins, R. Frizzell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Netherlands 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Greece 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 38 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 27%
Researcher 9 20%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Neuroscience 4 9%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2007.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#512
of 2,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,832
of 40,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.