↓ Skip to main content

難治性神経・筋疾患に対するコミュニケーション支援技術: 透明文字盤,口文字法から最新のサイバニックインタフェースまで

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the National Institute of Public Health, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
難治性神経・筋疾患に対するコミュニケーション支援技術: 透明文字盤,口文字法から最新のサイバニックインタフェースまで
Published in
Journal of the National Institute of Public Health, November 2017
DOI 10.20683/jniph.66.5_491
Authors

中島 孝

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 33%
Researcher 2 33%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2018.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the National Institute of Public Health
#19
of 42 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,520
of 449,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the National Institute of Public Health
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one scored the same or higher as 23 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.