↓ Skip to main content

Father Early Engagement Behaviors and Infant Low Birth Weight

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Father Early Engagement Behaviors and Infant Low Birth Weight
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10995-018-2521-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shawna J. Lee, Diana T. Sanchez, Andrew Grogan-Kaylor, Joyce Y. Lee, Analia Albuja

Abstract

Objective To examine the association of father early engagement behaviors and infant low birth weight (LBW) among unmarried, urban couples. Methods Participants were from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, a birth-cohort study of urban families. We conducted cross-sectional analyses of data from interviews with unmarried mothers and fathers (N = 2726) that took place at the time of their child's birth. Early engagement behaviors were based on fathers' self-report of whether during the pregnancy they gave mothers money to buy things for the baby, helped in other ways like providing transportation to prenatal clinics, and attended the birth. Results Most (68.9%) fathers engaged in all three early engagement behaviors; 22% engaged in 2 behaviors; and 9.1% engaged in 1 or 0 early engagement behaviors. LBW more than doubled when comparing infants of fathers who engaged in all three early engagement behaviors (9.6% predicted probability of LBW) to those fathers who engaged in no early engagement behaviors (over 22% predicted probability of LBW). Conclusion Infant and maternal health may benefit from intervention to encourage positive father engagement during pregnancy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 29 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,939,757
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#275
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,103
of 338,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#8
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.