↓ Skip to main content

Novel electrochemical aptasensor for ultrasensitive detection of sulfadimidine based on covalently linked multi-walled carbon nanotubes and in situ synthesized gold nanoparticle composites

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Novel electrochemical aptasensor for ultrasensitive detection of sulfadimidine based on covalently linked multi-walled carbon nanotubes and in situ synthesized gold nanoparticle composites
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00216-018-0970-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Baoshan He, Gengan Du

Abstract

In the current study, a sensitive electrochemical sensing strategy based on aptamer (APT) for detection of sulfadimidine (SM2) was developed. A bare gold electrode (AuE) was first modified with 2-aminoethanethiol (2-AET) through self-assembly, used as linker for the subsequent immobilization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes and gold nanoparticle composites (MWCNTs/AuNPs). Then, the thiolated APT was assembled onto the electrode via sulfur-gold affinity. When SM2existed, the APT combined with SM2and formed a complex structure. The specific binding of SM2and APT increased the impedance, leading to hard electron transfer between the electrode surface and the redox probe [Fe(CN)6]3-/4-and producing a significant reduction of the signal. The SM2concentration could be reflected by the current difference of the peak currents before and after target binding. Under optimized conditions, the linear dynamic range is from 0.1 to 50 ng mL-1, with a detection limit of 0.055 ng mL-1. The sensor exhibited desirable selectivity against other sulfonamides and performs successfully when analyzing SM2in pork samples. Graphical abstract A new electrochemical biosensor for ultrasensitive detection of sulfadimidine (SM2) by using a gold electrode modified with MWCNTs/AuNPs for signal amplification and aptamer (APT) for selectivity improvement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 10 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 10 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#6,602
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,116
of 346,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#130
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.