↓ Skip to main content

Should we rely on Doppler ultrasound for evaluation of testicular solid lesions?

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Urology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Should we rely on Doppler ultrasound for evaluation of testicular solid lesions?
Published in
World Journal of Urology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00345-018-2273-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Baris Esen, Muhiddin Önder Yaman, Sümer Baltacı

Abstract

Colour Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) is the main radiologic tool to evaluate scrotal masses and intratesticular-vascularised solid lesions are mostly considered malign lesions. Objective of this trial is determine ratio of benign lesions in patients with hypervascularised solid intratesticular lesions. Patients who underwent radical orchiectomy due to hypervascularised intratesticular solid lesions detected in CDUS are evaluated retrospectively. Those with previous testicular cancer history and inguinal/scrotal surgeries were excluded from the study. All patients are evaluated for age, preoperative testicular atrophy, multicentricity, echotexture and size of solid lesions, preoperative tumor markers (AFP, bHCG and LDH), and postoperative pathology results. Two tailed p value test was used to evaluate numeric parameters and Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate non-numeric parameters. A total of 117 patients with a mean age of 35.9 (5-86) were included to the study. Mean size of solid lesions was 4.39 cm. Seven patients had subcentimeter (subcm) lesions. 101 patients had hypoechoic, ten patients had isoechoic and six patients hyperechoic solid lesions. Preoperatively 60 patients (51.2%) had at least one tumor marker elevated. Postoperative pathology examination resulted to; 21 patients (17.9%) had benign lesions. Elevation of tumor markers, palpability, hypoechoic texture and larger size of the solid lesion were found to be parameters that predict malignancy. Benign incidence of vascular testicular solid lesions detected with scrotal ultrasound with colour Doppler is greater than expected. In patients with smaller, non-palpable lesions without elevated tumor markers, treatment options other than radical orchiectomy such as testicular sparing surgery should be considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 19%
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2018.
All research outputs
#20,469,520
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#1,930
of 2,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,702
of 331,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#67
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.