↓ Skip to main content

Polymorphism at donkey β-lactoglobulin II locus: identification and characterization of a new genetic variant with a very low expression

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Polymorphism at donkey β-lactoglobulin II locus: identification and characterization of a new genetic variant with a very low expression
Published in
Amino Acids, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00726-018-2555-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Criscione, Vincenzo Cunsolo, Serena Tumino, Antonella Di Francesco, Salvatore Bordonaro, Vera Muccilli, Rosaria Saletti, Donata Marletta

Abstract

In the last years, donkey milk had evidenced a renewed interest as a potential functional food and a breast milk substitute. In this light, the study of the protein composition assumes an important role. In particular, β-lactoglobulin (β-LG), which is considered as one of the main allergenic milk protein, in donkey species consists of two molecular forms, namely β-LG I and β-LG II. In the present research, a genetic analysis coupled with a proteomic approach showed the presence of a new allele, here named F, which is apparently associated with a null or a severely reduced expression of β-LG II protein. The new β-LG II F genetic variant shows a theoretical average mass (Mav) of 18,310.64 Da, a value practically corresponding with that of the variant D (∆mass < 0.07 Da), but differs from β-LG II D for two amino acid substitutions: Thr100(variant F) → Ala100(variant D) and Thr118(variant F) → Met118(variant D). Proteomic investigation of the whey protein fraction of an individual milk sample, homozygous FF at β-LG II locus, allowed to identify, as very minor component, the new β-LG II F genetic variant. By MS/MS analysis of enzymatic digests, the sequence of the β-LG II F was characterized, and the predicted genomic data confirmed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Professor 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Librarian 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,591,506
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#1,164
of 1,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,517
of 331,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.