↓ Skip to main content

Surface morphology of the orbitofrontal cortex in individuals at risk of psychosis: a multicenter study

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 1,243)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Surface morphology of the orbitofrontal cortex in individuals at risk of psychosis: a multicenter study
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00406-018-0890-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mihoko Nakamura, Tsutomu Takahashi, Yoichiro Takayanagi, Daiki Sasabayashi, Naoyuki Katagiri, Atsushi Sakuma, Chika Obara, Shinsuke Koike, Hidenori Yamasue, Atsushi Furuichi, Mikio Kido, Yumiko Nishikawa, Kyo Noguchi, Kazunori Matsumoto, Masafumi Mizuno, Kiyoto Kasai, Michio Suzuki

Abstract

Changes in the surface morphology of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), such as a fewer orbital sulci and altered sulcogyral pattern of the 'H-shaped' orbital sulcus, have been reported in schizophrenia, possibly reflecting abnormal neurodevelopment during gestation. However, whether high-risk subjects for developing psychosis also exhibit these gross morphologic anomalies is not well documented. This multicenter MRI study from four scanning sites in Japan investigated the distribution of the number of intermediate and posterior orbital sulci, as well as the OFC sulcogyral pattern, in 125 individuals with an at-risk mental state (ARMS) [of whom 22 later developed psychosis (ARMS-P) and 89 did not (ARMS-NP)] and 110 healthy controls. The ARMS group as a whole had a significantly lower number of intermediate and posterior orbital sulci compared with the controls, which was associated with prodromal symptomatology. However, there was no group difference in OFC pattern distribution. The ARMS-P and -NP groups did not differ in OFC surface morphology. These results suggest that gross morphology of the OFC in high-risk subjects may at least partly reflect neurodevelopmental pathology related to vulnerability to psychosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Psychology 7 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2022.
All research outputs
#369,796
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#14
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,130
of 333,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.