↓ Skip to main content

HMGB1: Endogenous Danger Signaling

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Medicine, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
673 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
Title
HMGB1: Endogenous Danger Signaling
Published in
Molecular Medicine, April 2008
DOI 10.2119/2008-00034.klune
Pubmed ID
Authors

John R. Klune, Rajeev Dhupar, Jon Cardinal, Timothy R. Billiar, Allan Tsung

Abstract

While foreign pathogens and their products have long been known to activate the innate immune system, the recent recognition of a group of endogenous molecules that serve a similar function has provided a framework for understanding the overlap between the inflammatory responses activated by pathogens and injury. These endogenous molecules, termed alarmins, are normal cell constituents that can be released into the extracellular milieu during states of cellular stress or damage and subsequently activate the immune system. One nuclear protein, High mobility group box-1 (HMGB1), has received particular attention as fulfilling the functions of an alarmin by being involved in both infectious and non-infectious inflammatory conditions. Once released, HMGB1 signals through various receptors to activate immune cells involved in the immune process. Although initial studies demonstrated HMGB1 as a late mediator of sepsis, recent findings indicate HMGB1 to have an important role in models of non-infectious inflammation, such as autoimmunity, cancer, trauma, and ischemia reperfusion injury. Furthermore, in contrast to its pro-inflammatory functions, there is evidence that HMGB1 also has restorative effects leading to tissue repair and regeneration. The complex functions of HMGB1 as an archetypical alarmin are outlined here to review our current understanding of a molecule that holds the potential for treatment in many important human conditions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 330 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 21%
Researcher 62 18%
Student > Master 42 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 23 7%
Other 63 18%
Unknown 57 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 76 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 7%
Neuroscience 8 2%
Other 38 11%
Unknown 70 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,555,741
of 23,452,723 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Medicine
#77
of 1,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,019
of 82,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Medicine
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,452,723 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.