↓ Skip to main content

Identification of novel DKC1 mutations in patients with dyskeratosis congenita: implications for pathophysiology and diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Identification of novel DKC1 mutations in patients with dyskeratosis congenita: implications for pathophysiology and diagnosis
Published in
Human Genetics, April 2001
DOI 10.1007/s004390100494
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart Knight, Tom Vulliamy, Ben Morgan, Koen Devriendt, Philip Mason, Inderjeet Dokal

Abstract

Dyskeratosis congenita (DC) is characterised by the failure of those tissues that are rapidly dividing in the adult, particularly the skin and haemopoietic system. The X-linked form of the disease is caused by mutations in the DKC1 gene. To date the only DKC1 mutations detected result in alterations in the amino acid sequence of dyskerin. Dyskerin is the catalytic subunit of the H+ACA box small nucleolar RNA particles responsible for the site-specific pseudouridination of rRNA and in humans is also a component of the telomerase complex. In order to further characterise the disease at the molecular level, male DC patients from 25 families were screened for mutations in the DKC1 gene. Sequence variations were detected in 10 of these families. In five families, previously identified mutations were detected. Of the five novel sequence changes, three were coding changes: R158 W, S280R and P384L. A fourth sequence change was detected in the 5'-flanking region that disrupts a putative Spl transcription factor binding site. An intronic change was also detected that resulted in the partial incorporation of a portion of intron 1 into the mRNA. The identification of this mutation highlights the importance of screening for mutations that cause the partial aberrant splicing of mRNA. This is the first report of DKC1 mutations that are predicted to affect the level of expression of dyskerin. This suggests that a decrease in the amount of the normal protein may cause the disease.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 26%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Chemistry 3 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#1,014
of 2,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,512
of 43,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.