↓ Skip to main content

Arctic sea ice as feeding ground for amphipods – food sources and strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Arctic sea ice as feeding ground for amphipods – food sources and strategies
Published in
Polar Biology, January 2001
DOI 10.1007/s003000000177
Authors

M. Poltermann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 75 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 27%
Researcher 21 27%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 42%
Environmental Science 19 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#634
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,247
of 114,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.