↓ Skip to main content

An observation of between-mates feeding behaviour in chick-guarding chinstrap penguins

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
An observation of between-mates feeding behaviour in chick-guarding chinstrap penguins
Published in
Polar Biology, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00300-010-0842-8
Authors

Yoshihisa Mori, Nobuo Kokubun, Hyoung-Chul Shin, Akinori Takahashi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Other 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 57%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 14%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,548,107
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#603
of 1,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,689
of 94,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.