↓ Skip to main content

The mutation spectrum of the bestrophin protein – functional implications

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, June 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
The mutation spectrum of the bestrophin protein – functional implications
Published in
Human Genetics, June 1999
DOI 10.1007/s004390050972
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Bakall, Towa Marknell, Sofie Ingvast, Markus J. Koisti, Ola Sandgren, Wen Li, Arthur A. B. Bergen, Sten Andreasson, Tomas Rosenberg, Konstantin Petrukhin, Claes Wadelius

Abstract

Best's macular dystrophy (BMD), also known as vitelliform macular degeneration type 2 (VMD2; OMIM 153700), is an autosomal dominant form of macular degeneration with mainly juvenile onset. BMD is characterized by the accumulation of lipofuscin within and beneath the retinal pigment epithelium. The gene causing the disease has been localized to 11q13 by recombination breakpoint mapping. Recently, we have identified the causative gene encoding a protein named bestrophin, and mutations have been found mainly to affect residues that are conserved from a family of genes in Caenorhabditis elegans. The function of bestrophin is so far unknown, and no reliable predictions can be made from sequence comparisons. We have investigated the bestrophin gene in 14 unrelated Swedish, Dutch, Danish, and Moroccan families affected with BMD and found eight new mutations. Including the previously published mutations, 15 different missense mutations have now been detected in 19 of the 22 families with BMD investigated by our laboratory. Interestingly, the mutations cluster in certain regions, and no nonsense mutations or mutations causing frame-shifts have been identified. Computer simulations of the structural elements in the bestrophin protein show that this protein is probably membrane bound, with four putative transmembrane regions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Egypt 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Professor 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#1,014
of 2,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,564
of 35,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#7
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.