↓ Skip to main content

Identification of the familial cylindromatosis tumour-suppressor gene

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, June 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
600 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of the familial cylindromatosis tumour-suppressor gene
Published in
Nature Genetics, June 2000
DOI 10.1038/76006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Graham R. Bignell, William Warren, Sheila Seal, Meiko Takahashi, Elizabeth Rapley, Rita Barfoot, Helen Green, Carolanne Brown, Patrick J. Biggs, Sunil R. Lakhani, Christopher Jones, Juliana Hansen, Edward Blair, Benedikt Hofmann, Reiner Siebert, Gwen Turner, D. Gareth Evans, Connie Schrander-Stumpel, Frits A. Beemer, Ans van den Ouweland, Dicky Halley, Bertrand Delpech, Mark G. Cleveland, Irene Leigh, Jaakko Leisti, Sonja Rasmussen, Margaret R. Wallace, Christiane Fenske, Piu Banerjee, Naoki Oiso, Ranbir Chaggar, Samantha Merrett, Niamh Leonard, Marcel Huber, Daniel Hohl, Pam Chapman, John Burn, Sally Swift, Anna Smith, Alan Ashworth, Michael R. Stratton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 158 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 18%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 28 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Chemistry 5 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 35 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,244,684
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#2,840
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,641
of 40,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#9
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.