↓ Skip to main content

Exploration of the variety of teachers’ VNOS in China: Is the “step-over development” approach effective?

Overview of attention for article published in Asia-Pacific Science Education, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Exploration of the variety of teachers’ VNOS in China: Is the “step-over development” approach effective?
Published in
Asia-Pacific Science Education, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41029-018-0023-6
Authors

Qi Lu, Hongshia Zhang, Bing Wei

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Unknown 6 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Decision Sciences 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 6 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2018.
All research outputs
#13,007,687
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Asia-Pacific Science Education
#9
of 44 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,535
of 331,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asia-Pacific Science Education
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one scored the same or higher as 35 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them