↓ Skip to main content

Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
79 news outlets
blogs
22 blogs
twitter
456 X users
facebook
19 Facebook pages
wikipedia
212 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
9 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
8 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
1432 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1182 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe
Published in
Nature, March 2015
DOI 10.1038/nature14317
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wolfgang Haak, Iosif Lazaridis, Nick Patterson, Nadin Rohland, Swapan Mallick, Bastien Llamas, Guido Brandt, Susanne Nordenfelt, Eadaoin Harney, Kristin Stewardson, Qiaomei Fu, Alissa Mittnik, Eszter Bánffy, Christos Economou, Michael Francken, Susanne Friederich, Rafael Garrido Pena, Fredrik Hallgren, Valery Khartanovich, Aleksandr Khokhlov, Michael Kunst, Pavel Kuznetsov, Harald Meller, Oleg Mochalov, Vayacheslav Moiseyev, Nicole Nicklisch, Sandra L. Pichler, Roberto Risch, Manuel A. Rojo Guerra, Christina Roth, Anna Szécsényi-Nagy, Joachim Wahl, Matthias Meyer, Johannes Krause, Dorcas Brown, David Anthony, Alan Cooper, Kurt Werner Alt, David Reich

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 456 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 <1%
Germany 9 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Other 15 1%
Unknown 1126 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 272 23%
Researcher 174 15%
Student > Bachelor 147 12%
Student > Master 142 12%
Other 60 5%
Other 189 16%
Unknown 198 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 330 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 240 20%
Arts and Humanities 131 11%
Social Sciences 70 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 2%
Other 148 13%
Unknown 238 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1132. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#13,346
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#1,349
of 98,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93
of 271,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#13
of 986 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 986 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.