| Title |
Evidence for duplication of the human salivary amylase gene
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Genetics, February 1982
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00281260 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan C. Pronk, Rune R. Frants, Wim Jansen, Aldur W. Eriksson, Gerard J. M. Tonino |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 44% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 22% |
| Researcher | 2 | 22% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2007.
All research outputs
#8,515,843
of 25,381,151 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#1,013
of 2,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,405
of 30,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them