You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy of topical Linum usitatissimum L. (flaxseed) oil in knee osteoarthritis: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.03.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seyed Hamdollah Mosavat, Nematollah Masoudi, Homa Hajimehdipoor, Mohammad Kazem Emami Meybodi, Zahra Niktabe, Malihe Tabarrai, Fereshteh Ghorat, Mahmoud Khodadoost |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2018.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
#794
of 1,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,536
of 351,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
#34
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.