↓ Skip to main content

Comparative genomic sequence analysis of the Williams syndrome region (LIMK1-RFC2) of human Chromosome 7q11.23

Overview of attention for article published in Mammalian Genome, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Comparative genomic sequence analysis of the Williams syndrome region (LIMK1-RFC2) of human Chromosome 7q11.23
Published in
Mammalian Genome, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s003350010166
Pubmed ID
Authors

Duane W. Martindale, Michael D. Wilson, Diana Wang, Robert D. Burke, Xianming Chen, Vincent Duronio, Ben F. Koop

Abstract

Williams syndrome (WS) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder arising from a microdeletion at Chr band 7q11.23, which results in a hemizygous condition for a number of genes. Within this region we have completely characterized 200 kb containing the genes LIMK1, WBSCR1, and RFC2. Evidence was also found for WBSCR5 in this region, but not the previously proposed genes WSCR2 and WSCR6. The syntenic region in mouse was also sequenced (115 kb) and characterized, and a comparative sequence analysis with a percent identity plot (PIP) easily allowed us to identify coding exons. This genomic region is GC rich (50.1% human, 49.9% mouse) and contains an unusually high abundance of repetitive elements consisting primarily of Alu (45.4%, one of the highest levels identified to date) in human, and the B family of SINES (30.6% of the total sequence) in mouse. WBSCR1 corresponds to eukaryotic initiation factor 4H, identified in rabbit, and is herein found to be constitutively expressed in both human and mouse, with two RNA and protein products formed (exon 5 is alternatively spliced). The transcription pattern of WBSCR5 was also examined and discussed along with its putative amino acid sequence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 24%
Researcher 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 9 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Mammalian Genome
#318
of 1,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,699
of 221,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammalian Genome
#27
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.