↓ Skip to main content

Gleichzeitige Frakturen von Acromion und Korakoid

Overview of attention for article published in Die Unfallchirurgie, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Gleichzeitige Frakturen von Acromion und Korakoid
Published in
Die Unfallchirurgie, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00113-018-0480-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Westphal, Roland Lippisch, Julian Jürgens, Stefan Piatek

Abstract

Simultaneous fracture of the acromion and coracoid process represents a double disruption of the superior shoulder suspensory complex (SSSC). To date, the two largest reported series have comprised five and eight cases. The aim of this study was to investigate the functional outcome in patients who sustained this rare injury and to provide a review of the relevant literature. In this retrospective study, patients who were surgically treated between 2009 and 2014 were identified from medical records and the patients were asked to attend a follow-up examination. Functional results, measured as the Constant score and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, were the main outcomes of the study. A total of six patients underwent surgery for this type of double disruption of the SSSC. All but one patient suffered a high-impact trauma with other associated injuries. The coracoid fracture was classified as type I according to Ogawa in all cases, and the acromion fracture was type III according to Kuhn in 5 out of 6 cases. At least one of the fracture sites was stabilized. Of the patients one showed a concurrent lateral clavicle fracture, representing a third disruption of the SSSC, and another had a fracture of the medial third of the clavicle, representing a strut fracture. In these cases, two fracture sites were operated on. At an average follow-up period of 47 months all but one fracture had healed. In one patient, asymptomatic non-union of the acromion was found. The average DASH score was 22 points and the average Constant score was 74 points. This rare injury pattern is usually caused by high-impact trauma, and concomitant injuries frequently occur. Nevertheless, surgical stabilization of at least one of the fracture sites showed satisfactory functional results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 43%
Unknown 4 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2022.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Die Unfallchirurgie
#266
of 819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,344
of 347,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Unfallchirurgie
#5
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 819 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.