↓ Skip to main content

Well-balanced schemes for the shallow water equations with Coriolis forces

Overview of attention for article published in Numerische Mathematik, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Well-balanced schemes for the shallow water equations with Coriolis forces
Published in
Numerische Mathematik, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00211-017-0928-0
Authors

Alina Chertock, Michael Dudzinski, Alexander Kurganov, Mária Lukáčová-Medvid’ová

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 50%
Professor 2 14%
Unspecified 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 8 57%
Unspecified 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,495,840
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Numerische Mathematik
#191
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,681
of 438,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Numerische Mathematik
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them