↓ Skip to main content

Use of human reconstructed epidermis to analyze the regulation of β-defensin hBD-1, hBD-2, and hBD-3 expression in response to LPS

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Biology and Toxicology, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Use of human reconstructed epidermis to analyze the regulation of β-defensin hBD-1, hBD-2, and hBD-3 expression in response to LPS
Published in
Cell Biology and Toxicology, October 2003
DOI 10.1023/b:cbto.0000004975.36521.c8
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Chadebech, D. Goidin, C. Jacquet, J. Viac, D. Schmitt, M-J. Staquet

Abstract

Defensins have been identified as key elements of innate immunity against microbial infections. In the present study, human beta-defensin-2 (hBD-2) mRNA and peptide expression were evaluated by RT-PCR and Western blotting in normal human keratinocytes, in function of their stage of differentiation. In proliferating, non-differentiating keratinocytes generated in serum-free, low-calcium medium, a very low hBD-2 mRNA expression was found. A significantly higher expression was detected in high-calcium cultivated keratinocytes grown either as monolayers or as multilayers under submerged conditions. In an air-liquid interface culture of keratinocytes, allowing epidermis to be reconstructed, hBD-2 mRNA expression level was significantly higher than in the other conditions and displayed inter-individual variability as observed in native epidermis. The peptide was detected only in reconstructed epidermis. These results indicate that hBD-2 gene expression in normal human keratinocytes is dependent upon their stage of differentiation. The level of expression of hBD-1 mRNA was lower and that of hBD-3 was higher than that of hBD-2 in reconstructed epidermis. Exposure of reconstructed epidermis to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) resulted in an average 4-fold increase in hBD-2 mRNA 18 h after challenge, but not of hBD-1 and hBD-3 gene expression. These results show the selective regulation of hBD-2-encoding gene in an organotypic epidermal model, in response to LPS. They also provide evidence that in vitro reconstructed epidermis represents a useful model for studying regulation of expression of beta-defensins after skin challenge with pathogenic microorganisms in conditions as close as possible to the in vivo situation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Sweden 1 4%
Thailand 1 4%
Switzerland 1 4%
Unknown 22 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 27%
Researcher 6 23%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Chemistry 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cell Biology and Toxicology
#61
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,072
of 56,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Biology and Toxicology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them