↓ Skip to main content

CHMP2B mutations are rare in French families with frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
CHMP2B mutations are rare in French families with frontotemporal lobar degeneration
Published in
Journal of Neurology, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00415-010-5655-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mustapha Ghanim, Léna Guillot-Noel, Florence Pasquier, Ludmila Jornea, Vincent Deramecourt, Bruno Dubois, Isabelle Le Ber, Alexis Brice, The French Research Network on FTD and FTD/MND

Abstract

Two C-truncating CHMP2B (chromatin modifying protein 2B) mutations were recently found in Danish and Belgian families with autosomal dominant forms of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). In addition, few CHMP2B missense mutations of uncertain pathogenic role were reported in several families with FTLD or FTLD associated with motoneuron disease (FTLD-MND). In order to determine the genetic contribution of CHMP2B mutations in FTLD and FTLD-MND families, we analyzed the CHMP2B gene in 198 French probands with familial FTLD and FTLD-MND. One CHMP2B missense variant was found in a proband with familial FTLD (0.8%). The pathogenic role of CHMP2B missense variants is unclear, however the pSer194Leu substitution, located in the C-terminal domain of the protein, was predicted to alter the stability of the protein by in silico analyses. We conclude that CHMP2B mutations represent a rare cause of familial FTLD and they are not implicated in familial FTLD-MND in French patients. The previously reported C-truncating CHMP2B mutations may be private to the Danish and Belgian pedigrees.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 29%
Professor 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Neuroscience 4 14%
Psychology 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,774
of 4,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,815
of 94,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.