↓ Skip to main content

Impact of continuous regional arterial infusion in the treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: analysis of a national administrative database

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastroenterology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Impact of continuous regional arterial infusion in the treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: analysis of a national administrative database
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00535-018-1452-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akira Endo, Atsushi Shiraishi, Kiyohide Fushimi, Kiyoshi Murata, Yasuhiro Otomo

Abstract

Although continuous regional arterial infusion (CRAI) of protease inhibitors and broad antibiotics has been suggested as one of the therapeutic option for patients with acute necrotic pancreatitis (ANP), the effectiveness has not been well-corroborated in clinical studies. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a Japanese national administrative database. Severe acute pancreatitis patients with a poorly enhanced pancreas region (i.e., definitive or clinically suspected ANP) were identified and dichotomized according to whether CRAI was performed. We compared the outcomes of in-hospital mortality, surgical interventions, hospital-free days, and healthcare costs between groups adjusted by the well-validated case-mix adjustment model using a multivariate mixed-effect regression analysis and a propensity score matching analysis. Of 243,312 acute pancreatitis patients, 702 eligible patients were identified, of these 339 patients underwent CRAI. The case-mix adjustment model established had good predictability for in-hospital mortality with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.87. CRAI was significantly associated with reduced in-hospital mortality [14.5% in the CRAI group vs. 18.2% in the non-CRAI group, adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval; CI) = 0.60 (0.36-0.97)]. Significant associations were not observed for the frequency of surgical interventions and mean hospital-free days; however, significantly higher healthcare costs were observed in the CRAI group. Results of the propensity score matching analysis did not alter these results. Analysis of a nationwide large-scale database suggested that CRAI was significantly associated with reduced in-hospital mortality for patients with ANP. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 12 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 35%
Unspecified 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Unknown 14 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,591,506
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastroenterology
#857
of 1,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,173
of 332,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastroenterology
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.