↓ Skip to main content

Allele-specific PCR amplification due to sequence identity between a PCR primer and an amplicon : is direct sequencing so reliable?

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Allele-specific PCR amplification due to sequence identity between a PCR primer and an amplicon : is direct sequencing so reliable?
Published in
Human Genetics, April 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00439-002-0735-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shiro Ikegawa, Akihiko Mabuchi, Masako Ogawa, Toshiyuki Ikeda

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Philippines 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 26%
Researcher 5 26%
Other 4 21%
Professor 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2007.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#933
of 2,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,851
of 121,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.