| Title |
Shared Decision-Making: a Systematic Review Focusing on Mood Disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Psychiatry Reports, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11920-018-0892-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ludovic Samalin, Jean-Baptiste Genty, Laurent Boyer, Jorge Lopez-Castroman, Mocrane Abbar, Pierre-Michel Llorca |
| Abstract |
This study aims to provide a review of the randomized controlled studies evaluating the effects of shared decision-making (SDM) intervention in comparison to care as usual in patients with mood disorders. Of the 14 randomized controlled studies identified, only three 6-month studies evaluated the interest of SDM interventions using decision aids in depressed patients. All of them showed that the intervention effectively improved patient satisfaction and engagement in the decision-making process. Only one study in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) showed improvement of depressive symptoms, functioning, and quality of life. Other included studies were collaborative care interventions using a SDM approach in patients with depression in specific populations depending on age, gender, income, and physical comorbidities. All of them showed significant improvement in depression outcomes or medication adherence. SDM interventions using decision aids and collaborative care showed evidence of improvements in the management of depression. Stronger evidence of SDM interest in BD is needed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 26% |
| Psychology | 19 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,893,471
of 25,262,379 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#651
of 1,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,413
of 336,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#16
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,262,379 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.