↓ Skip to main content

The vitamin D receptor expression in skeletal muscle of women with distal radius fracture

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Osteoporosis, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
The vitamin D receptor expression in skeletal muscle of women with distal radius fracture
Published in
Archives of Osteoporosis, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11657-018-0442-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kahyun Kim, Hyun Sik Gong, Jae-Young Lim, Jong Hee Kim, Goo Hyun Baek

Abstract

We evaluated the vitamin D receptor (VDR) expression in the forearm flexor muscle of women with distal radius fracture. High VDR expression was associated with low appendicular lean mass index. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between the VDR expression in the muscle cell and the muscle mass in women with a distal radius fracture (DRF). We prospectively recruited 45 women over 50 years of age (mean age, 66 years) with DRF and acquired biopsy of the forearm flexor muscle. The muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and VDR expression were measured using immunohistochemistry staining. The clinical parameters including grip strength, gait speed, body mass index (BMI), bone mineral density (BMD), and serum vitamin D levels were compared between patients grouped by appendicular lean mass index and were correlated with the VDR expression. Twelve patients (27%) showed a decreased appendicular lean mass index, less than the cut-off value of 5.4 kg/m2 which was suggested by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. Patients with a low appendicular lean mass index had significantly lower muscle CSA (p = 0.037), but a higher VDR expression (p = 0.045) than those with higher indices. VDR expression was negatively correlated with BMI (r = - 0.417, p = 0.004) and appendicular lean mass index (r = - 0.316, p = 0.044). DRF patients with low appendicular lean mass index presented high VDR expression and low CSA in forearm muscle cells. This suggests that the VDR expression might be upregulated in the attempt to compensate for the decreasing muscle mass. Further studies are necessary to explore the role of VDR in the progression of sarcopenia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Master 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 10 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2018.
All research outputs
#20,469,520
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Osteoporosis
#506
of 648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,924
of 332,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Osteoporosis
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.