↓ Skip to main content

Genomic organization of the human leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors within the leukocyte receptor complex on Chromosome 19q13.4

Overview of attention for article published in Immunogenetics, July 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Genomic organization of the human leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors within the leukocyte receptor complex on Chromosome 19q13.4
Published in
Immunogenetics, July 2000
DOI 10.1007/s002510000183
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Robert Liu, Joomyeong Kim, Chioma Nwankwo, Linda K. Ashworth, J. P. Arm

Abstract

The leukocyte immunoglobulin (Ig)-like receptors (LIRs) comprise a family of cell surface receptors that couple to either activating or inhibitory signals depending on the nature of their transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains. We describe the organization and fine localization of the genes for LIR-1 and LIR-5, which are inhibitory receptors, and LIR-6, which is an activating receptor. The genomic organization of all three genes is highly conserved from the signal peptide through the membrane-proximal Ig domain but diverges thereafter depending on the inhibitory or activating nature of the gene product. The 3' untranslated region of the gene for LIR-6 contains a 37-base pair repeat not present in the LIR-1 or LIR-5 genes. 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends defined the putative transcription initiation site of the LIR-5 gene, which is TATA-less. A nucleotide substitution in the LIR-5 gene led to loss of an intron present in the 5' untranslated region of the LIR-1 and LIR-6 genes. Differences in the genomic structure of these three LIR genes suggests possible mechanisms for their differential expression in cells of hematopoietic lineage. The three genes are in a region of Chromosome 19q13.4 that is immediately centromeric of the killer cell Ig-like receptor genes and are separated from one another by approximately 20 to 30 kb, suggesting that they arose by gene duplication from a common ancestor.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Montenegro 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 6 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Immunogenetics
#350
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,226
of 39,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunogenetics
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.