↓ Skip to main content

Eventual re-vitrification or storage in liquid nitrogen vapor does not jeopardize the practical handling and transport of vitrified pig embryos

Overview of attention for article published in Theriogenology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eventual re-vitrification or storage in liquid nitrogen vapor does not jeopardize the practical handling and transport of vitrified pig embryos
Published in
Theriogenology, March 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.03.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alicia Nohalez, Cristina A Martinez, Inmaculada Parrilla, Carolina Maside, Jordi Roca, María A Gil, Heriberto Rodriguez-Martinez, Emilio A Martinez, Cristina Cuello

Abstract

This study aimed (1) to evaluate the in vitro post-warming survival of porcine embryos after re-vitrification and (2) to assess the efficacy of transport of embryos in dry shipper (DS) in maintaining the viability and quality of vitrified embryos for a 3-day period. Embryos at the compacted or cavitating morula (CCM) and unhatched blastocyst (UBL) stages were surgically obtained from weaned, crossbred sows. In the first experiment, more than 85% of the embryos survived an initial vitrification and warming and achieved comparable survival rates to those of their fresh counterparts. In contrast, those embryos subjected to a second vitrification and warming had clearly lower survival rates (60% and 64% for re-vitrified embryos from the CCM and UBL groups, respectively) compared to the survival rates of the initial vitrification and fresh control groups (P < 0.01). Hatching rates were similar in re-vitrified blastocysts derived from vitrified CCMs and fresh control groups (50.8% and 55.3%, respectively). However, differences (P < 0.01) in hatching rates were recorded in re-vitrified blastocysts derived from vitrified UBLs and fresh control blastocysts (14.7% and 90.0%, respectively). In the second experiment, vitrified embryos were stored in a liquid nitrogen tank for one month. Then, the straws containing the embryos were transferred to a DS (DS group) or to another liquid nitrogen tank (control group) for an additional three days. Embryos from the DS and control groups had similar survival and hatching rates, regardless of the embryonic stage considered. The DS storage of CCMs and UBLs did not affect their development after culturing, including total cell numbers, compared to the control, although their apoptotic index was slightly higher (P < 0.05), regardless of the developmental stage. In conclusion, although re-vitrification negatively affects embryo survival, this study demonstrated that >60% of vitrified embryos could be successfully re-vitrified and re-warmed. The present study also showed the effectiveness of the DS for the storage of vitrified porcine CCMs and UBLs for at least three 3 days.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Professor 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Theriogenology
#2,134
of 3,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,077
of 348,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theriogenology
#16
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,238 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.