↓ Skip to main content

SNPマーカーを用いた台湾牛種と黒毛和種および欧米種との遺伝的関係の解析

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SNPマーカーを用いた台湾牛種と黒毛和種および欧米種との遺伝的関係の解析
Published in
Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho, January 2018
DOI 10.2508/chikusan.89.7
Authors

Teng-hui LEE, Yan-chun WANG, Satoshi NAKAMURA, Yoshitaka NAGAMINE

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,929,231
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,715
of 451,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them