↓ Skip to main content

Tris (2,2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II) electrogenerated chemiluminescence in analytical science

Overview of attention for article published in Microchimica Acta, March 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
236 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Tris (2,2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II) electrogenerated chemiluminescence in analytical science
Published in
Microchimica Acta, March 1997
DOI 10.1007/bf01243160
Authors

Won-Yong Lee

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Oman 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 9 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 18 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Microchimica Acta
#187
of 1,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,349
of 29,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microchimica Acta
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,385 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.