↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of the apolipoprotein E ε4 allele in amyloid β positive subjects across the spectrum of Alzheimer's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
28 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of the apolipoprotein E ε4 allele in amyloid β positive subjects across the spectrum of Alzheimer's disease
Published in
Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association, March 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niklas Mattsson, Colin Groot, Willemijn J. Jansen, Susan M. Landau, Victor L. Villemagne, Sebastiaan Engelborghs, Mark M. Mintun, Alberto Lleo, José Luis Molinuevo, William J. Jagust, Giovanni B. Frisoni, Adrian Ivanoiu, Gaël Chételat, Catarina Resende de Oliveira, Karen M. Rodrigue, Johannes Kornhuber, Anders Wallin, Aleksandra Klimkowicz‐Mrowiec, Ramesh Kandimalla, Julius Popp, Pauline P. Aalten, Dag Aarsland, Daniel Alcolea, Ina S. Almdahl, Inês Baldeiras, Mark A. van Buchem, Enrica Cavedo, Kewei Chen, Ann D. Cohen, Stefan Förster, Juan Fortea, Kristian S. Frederiksen, Yvonne Freund‐Levi, Kiran Dip Gill, Olymbia Gkatzima, Timo Grimmer, Harald Hampel, Sanna‐Kaisa Herukka, Peter Johannsen, Koen van Laere, Mony J. de Leon, Wolfgang Maier, Jan Marcusson, Olga Meulenbroek, Hanne M. Møllergård, John C. Morris, Barbara Mroczko, Arto Nordlund, Sudesh Prabhakar, Oliver Peters, Lorena Rami, Eloy Rodríguez‐Rodríguez, Catherine M. Roe, Eckart Rüther, Isabel Santana, Johannes Schröder, Sang W. Seo, Hilkka Soininen, Luiza Spiru, Erik Stomrud, Hanne Struyfs, Charlotte E. Teunissen, Frans R.J. Verhey, Stephanie J.B. Vos, Linda van Waalwijk van J.C. Doorn, Gunhild Waldemar, Åsa K. Wallin, Jens Wiltfang, Rik Vandenberghe, David J. Brooks, Tormod Fladby, Christopher C. Rowe, Alexander Drzezga, Marcel M. Verbeek, Marie Sarazin, David A. Wolk, Adam S. Fleisher, William E. Klunk, Duk L. Na, Pascual Sánchez‐Juan, Dong Young Lee, Agneta Nordberg, Magda Tsolaki, Vincent Camus, Juha O. Rinne, Anne M. Fagan, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Gil D. Rabinovici, Oskar Hansson, Bart N.M. van Berckel, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Philip Scheltens, Pieter Jelle Visser, Rik Ossenkoppele

Abstract

Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 is the major genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD), but its prevalence is unclear because earlier studies did not require biomarker evidence of amyloid β (Aβ) pathology. We included 3451 Aβ+ subjects (853 AD-type dementia, 1810 mild cognitive impairment, and 788 cognitively normal). Generalized estimating equation models were used to assess APOE ε4 prevalence in relation to age, sex, education, and geographical location. The APOE ε4 prevalence was 66% in AD-type dementia, 64% in mild cognitive impairment, and 51% in cognitively normal, and it decreased with advancing age in Aβ+ cognitively normal and Aβ+ mild cognitive impairment (P < .05) but not in Aβ+ AD dementia (P = .66). The prevalence was highest in Northern Europe but did not vary by sex or education. The APOE ε4 prevalence in AD was higher than that in previous studies, which did not require presence of Aβ pathology. Furthermore, our results highlight disease heterogeneity related to age and geographical location.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 196 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 15%
Student > Master 13 7%
Professor 13 7%
Other 12 6%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 57 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 18%
Neuroscience 30 15%
Psychology 20 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 72 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,123,772
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association
#509
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,907
of 344,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association
#15
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.