↓ Skip to main content

Small Players, Large Role: Microbial Influence on Biogeochemical Processes in Pelagic Aquatic Ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, March 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
492 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
668 Mendeley
Title
Small Players, Large Role: Microbial Influence on Biogeochemical Processes in Pelagic Aquatic Ecosystems
Published in
Ecosystems, March 2002
DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0059-3
Authors

James B. Cotner, Bopaiah A. Biddanda

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 668 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 2%
Germany 5 <1%
France 4 <1%
Colombia 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Estonia 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Other 15 2%
Unknown 613 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 150 22%
Researcher 133 20%
Student > Master 90 13%
Student > Bachelor 59 9%
Professor 36 5%
Other 126 19%
Unknown 74 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 274 41%
Environmental Science 176 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 54 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 2%
Other 30 4%
Unknown 97 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#795
of 1,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,217
of 51,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.