↓ Skip to main content

Relationship between frailty, polypharmacy, and underprescription in older adults living in nursing homes

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
41 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Relationship between frailty, polypharmacy, and underprescription in older adults living in nursing homes
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00228-018-2452-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Gutiérrez-Valencia, Mikel Izquierdo, Esther Lacalle-Fabo, Itxaso Marín-Epelde, María Fernanda Ramón-Espinoza, Thamara Domene-Domene, Álvaro Casas-Herrero, Arkaitz Galbete, Nicolás Martínez-Velilla

Abstract

Frailty, polypharmacy, and underprescription are considered a major matter of concern in nursing homes, but the possible relationships between them are not well known. The aim is to examine the possible association between medication underprescription, polypharmacy, and frailty in older people living in nursing homes. A cross-sectional analysis from a concurrent cohort study, including 110 subjects ≥ 65 years living in two nursing homes. Four frailty scales were applied; polypharmacy was defined as ≥ 5 medications and underprescription was measured with Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment (START) criteria. Logistic regression models were performed to assess the associations. The mean age was 86.3 years (SD 7.3) and 71.8% were female. 73.6% of subjects took ≥ 5 chronic medications and 60.9% met one or more START criteria. The non-frail participants took more medications than the frail subjects according to the imputated frailty Fried criteria (8.1 vs 6.7, p = 0.042) and the FRAIL-NH scale (7.8 vs 6.8, p = 0.026). Multivariate analyses did not find an association between frailty and polypharmacy. Frail participants according to the Fried criteria met a higher number of START criteria (1.9 vs 1.0, p = 0.017), and had a higher prevalence of underprescription (87.5 vs 50.0%), reaching the limit of statistical significance in multivariate analysis. The positive association found in previous studies between frailty and polypharmacy cannot be extrapolated to institutionalized populations. There is a trend towards higher rates of underprescription in frail subjects. Underprescription in frail older adults should be redefined and new strategies to measure it should be developed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 13%
Engineering 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 30 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,567,527
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#79
of 2,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,529
of 345,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.