| Title |
Streptomyces urticae sp. nov., isolated from rhizosphere soil of Urtica urens L.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10482-018-1072-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chenyu Piao, Ling Ling, Junwei Zhao, Liying Jin, Shanwen Jiang, Xiaowei Guo, Xiangjing Wang, Wensheng Xiang |
| Abstract |
Two novel Gram-stain positive, spore-forming, aerobic actinomycetes, designated NEAU-PCY-1Tand NEAU-PCY-2, were isolated from rhizosphere soil of Urtica urens L. collected from Anshan, Liaoning Province, northeast China. The 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed that strains NEAU-PCY-1Tand NEAU-PCY-2 exhibited 99.8% similarity with each other and are closely related to Streptomyces abietis DSM 42080T(98.2, 98.3%) and Streptomyces fildesensis DSM 41987T(98.0, 98.1%). Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that the two strains formed a cluster with these two closely related species. Moreover, DNA-DNA hybridization results and some phenotypic, physiological and biochemical properties differentiated the two strains from their close relatives in the genus Streptomyces. Based on a polyphasic taxonomy study, strains NEAU-PCY-1Tand NEAU-PCY-2 are considered to represent a novel species of the genus Streptomyces, for which the name Streptomyces urticae sp. nov. is proposed, with NEAU-PCY-1T(= DSM 105115T = CCTCC AA 2017015T) as the type strain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 33% |
| Other | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2018.
All research outputs
#17,937,475
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#1,521
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,780
of 330,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#30
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.