↓ Skip to main content

Next-generation sequencing reveals genetic landscape in 46, XY disorders of sexual development patients with variable phenotypes

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Next-generation sequencing reveals genetic landscape in 46, XY disorders of sexual development patients with variable phenotypes
Published in
Human Genetics, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00439-018-1879-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hao Wang, Lele Zhang, Nan Wang, Hui Zhu, Bing Han, Feng Sun, Haijun Yao, Qiang Zhang, Wenjiao Zhu, Tong Cheng, Kaixiang Cheng, Yang Liu, Shuangxia Zhao, Huaidong Song, Jie Qiao

Abstract

Disorders of sexual development (DSD) are rare congenital conditions in which chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomical sex is atypical. Currently, less than 20% of patients receive an accurate genetic diagnosis. Targeted next-generation sequencing, consisting of 33 candidate genes and 47 genes involved in sexual differentiation and development, was performed on 70 46, XY DSD patients. Functional assays were performed to evaluate the expression and transcriptional activity of one reported and nine novel mutations of NR5A1. In total, 113 mutations, including 86 novel and 27 reported sites in 40 genes, were identified in 52 patients. Among them, 37 mutations from 19 genes were first identified in 46, XY DSD patients, including EGF, LHX9, and CST9. Nine patients displayed biallelic mutations, 12 had mutations in sex chromosome genes and 14 had monoallelic mutations in NR5A1, BMP4, and WT1. Higher frequency mutations were identified in AR, SRD5A2, and NR5A1. Six missense, one frameshift, and one three-nucleotide deletion mutations of NR5A1 were shown to impair the transactivation ability with an altered nuclear aggregation of p.T29K and p.N44del variants. Multiple genetic mutations were identified in 33 of the 70 patients. The targeted sequencing panel provides an efficient method for the etiological diagnosis of 46, XY DSD patients and expands the candidate genes and inherited patterns.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Chemistry 3 7%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,594,219
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#2,705
of 2,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,671
of 330,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.