↓ Skip to main content

Analytical procedure for the determination of very volatile organic compounds (C3–C6) in indoor air

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Analytical procedure for the determination of very volatile organic compounds (C3–C6) in indoor air
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00216-018-1004-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Schieweck, Jan Gunschera, Deniz Varol, Tunga Salthammer

Abstract

The substance group of very volatile organic compounds (VVOCs) is moving into the focus of indoor air analysis, facing ongoing regulations at international and European levels targeting on indoor air quality and human health. However, there exists at present no validated analysis for the identification and quantification of VVOCs in indoor air. Therefore, the present study targeted on the development of an analytical method in order to sample the maximum possible quantity of VVOCs in indoor air on solid sorbents with subsequent analysis by thermal desorption and coupled gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (TDS-GC/MS). For this purpose, it was necessary to investigate the performance of available sorbents and to optimize the parameters of GC/MS analysis. Stainless steel tubes filled with Carbograph 5TD were applied successfully for low-volume sampling (2-4 l) with minimal breakthrough (< 1%). With the developed method, VVOCs between C3 and C6 of different volatility and polarity  can be detected even in trace quantities with low limits of quantitation (LOQ; 1-3 μg m-3). Limitations occur for low molecular weight compounds ≤C3, especially for polar substances, such as carboxylic acids and for some aldehydes and alcohols. Consequently, established methods for the quantification of these compounds in indoor air cannot be fully substituted yet. At least three different analytical techniques are needed to cover the large spectrum of relevant VVOCs in indoor air. In addition, unexpected reaction products might occur and need to be taken into account to avoid misinterpretation of chromatographic signals. Graphical abstract Solid sorbent sampling of VVOCs (C3-C6) in indoor air with subsequent TDS-GC/MS analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 27%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 22 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 17 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 11%
Environmental Science 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 27 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,359,319
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#1,696
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,291
of 344,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#33
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.