↓ Skip to main content

Rescue of an aggressive female sexual courtship in mice by CRISPR/Cas9 secondary mutation in vivo

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Rescue of an aggressive female sexual courtship in mice by CRISPR/Cas9 secondary mutation in vivo
Published in
BMC Research Notes, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13104-018-3307-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jozsef Zakany, Denis Duboule

Abstract

We had previously reported a mouse line carrying the Atypical female courtship (HoxDAfc) allele, where an ectopic accumulation of Hoxd10 transcripts was observed in a sparse population of cells in the adult isocortex, as a result of a partial deletion of the HoxD gene cluster. Female mice carrying this allele displayed an exacerbated paracopulatory behavior, culminating in a severe mutilation of the studs' external genitals. To unequivocally demonstrate that this intriguing phenotype was indeed caused by an illegitimate function of the HOXD10 protein, we use CRISPR/Cas9 technology to induce a microdeletion into the homeobox of the Hoxd10 gene in cis with the HoxDAfcallele. Females carrying this novel HoxDDel(1-9)d10hdallele no longer mutilate males. We conclude that a brain malfunction leading to a severe pathological behavior can be caused by the mere binding to DNA of a transcription factor expressed ectopically. We also show that in HoxDAfcmice, Hoxd10 was expressed in cells containing glutamate decarboxylase (Gad1) and Cholecystokinin (Cck) transcripts, corroborating our proposal that a small fraction of GABAergic neurons in adult hippocampus may participate to some aspects of female courtship.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2022.
All research outputs
#5,193,937
of 24,654,957 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#804
of 4,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,134
of 334,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#14
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,654,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.