| Title |
Comparison of three PCR-based assays for SNP genotyping in plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-018-0295-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chiara Broccanello, Claudia Chiodi, Andrew Funk, J. Mitchell McGrath, Lee Panella, Piergiorgio Stevanato |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| India | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 220 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Unknown | 55 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 88 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 19% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 61 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,771,279
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#135
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,970
of 346,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.