↓ Skip to main content

SNURF-SNRPN and UBE3A transcript levels in patients with Angelman syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
SNURF-SNRPN and UBE3A transcript levels in patients with Angelman syndrome
Published in
Human Genetics, March 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00439-004-1104-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maren Runte, Peter M. Kroisel, Gabriele Gillessen-Kaesbach, Raymonda Varon, Denise Horn, Monika Y. Cohen, Joseph Wagstaff, Bernhard Horsthemke, Karin Buiting

Abstract

The imprinted domain on human chromosome 15 consists of two oppositely imprinted gene clusters, which are under the control of an imprinting center (IC). The paternally expressed SNURF-SNRPN gene hosts several snoRNA genes and overlaps the UBE3A gene, which is encoded on the opposite strand, expressed - at least in brain cells - from the maternal chromosome only, and affected in patients with Angelman syndrome (AS). In contrast to SNURF-SNRPN, imprinted expression of UBE3A is not regulated by a 5' differentially methylated region. Here we report that splice forms of the SNURF-SNRPN transcript overlapping UBE3A in an antisense orientation are present in brain but barely detectable in blood. In contrast, splice forms that do not overlap with UBE3A are of similar abundance in brain and blood. The tissue distribution of the splice forms parallels that of the snoRNAs encoded in the respective parts of the SNURF-SNRPN transcript. Using a quantitative PCR assay, we have found that the ratio of SNURF-SNRPN/UBE3A transcript levels is increased in blood cells of AS patients with an imprinting defect, but not in AS patients with a UBE3A mutation or an unknown defect. Our findings are compatible with the assumption that imprinted UBE3A expression is regulated through the SNURF-SNRPN sense- UBE3A antisense transcript.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 26%
Neuroscience 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#1,014
of 2,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,513
of 63,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.